IELTS Writing Task 2: The Importance of Studying History (Band 9 Sample)
This "to what extent do you agree or disagree" question asks whether studying history is worthwhile or a waste of time in the modern world. A band-9 response takes a clear position and defends it while acknowledging the other side. Below is a model answer of roughly 280 words that disagrees with the idea that history is useless, followed by a breakdown of why it scores 9 on all four criteria.
Get your own IELTS essay graded by AI
Band scores on all four criteria, line-by-line corrections and a model rewrite — free to start.
01 · The task
Some people believe that studying history is a waste of time because it has little relevance to modern life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
02 · Band 9 sample answer
282 words · Band 9In an age obsessed with technology and the future, some argue that studying the past is pointless. While I accept that history should not crowd out practical subjects, I strongly disagree with the claim that it is a waste of time, because understanding the past is essential to making sense of the present.
1. Why history matters
The most compelling reason is that history teaches us lessons we would otherwise have to learn the hard way. By studying past conflicts, economic crises and social movements, societies can recognise warning signs and, ideally, avoid repeating the same mistakes. History also shapes identity: understanding where a country and its culture came from helps people make sense of who they are today. Just as importantly, the skills history develops — analysing evidence, weighing conflicting accounts and constructing an argument — are precisely the critical-thinking skills valued in almost any career.
2. The grain of truth in the claim
That said, the argument is not entirely without merit. In a fast-changing world, students clearly also need technical and practical skills, and a curriculum that focused only on the past would leave them ill-prepared. History, then, should be one important subject among many rather than a dominant one. But being less central is very different from being useless.
In conclusion, although history should sit alongside practical subjects rather than replace them, I firmly disagree that it is a waste of time, since it helps us avoid past mistakes, understand our identity and think critically.
03 · Why this scores Band 9
The prompt asks "to what extent", and the answer gives a precise degree — "I strongly disagree" — rather than a flat no. It develops that stance through lessons, identity and skills, while conceding that practical subjects also matter, then narrows the concession to protect its position.
The essay runs as case-for-history then a fairly-handled concession, one idea per paragraph, with the stance signalled early. Cohesion is natural — "The most compelling reason is...", "Just as importantly...", "That said...", "In conclusion" — without a mechanical stack of linkers.
Vocabulary is precise and idiomatic — "crowd out practical subjects", "learn the hard way", "recognise warning signs", "shapes identity", "ill-prepared" — with natural collocation carrying an abstract argument.
A wide range is controlled accurately: a concessive ("While I accept that history should not crowd out practical subjects"), a "would otherwise" structure ("lessons we would otherwise have to learn the hard way"), and a contrast ("being less central is very different from being useless"). The writing is error-free.
04 · Useful collocations for this task
Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural collocations like these lift your Lexical Resource score.
05 · Frequently asked questions
What does "to what extent do you agree or disagree" require?
It asks how strongly you agree, not just whether you do. Words such as "strongly", "largely" or "partly" signal the degree. This model says "I strongly disagree" that history is useless, which lets it defend the subject while conceding a limit.
Should I acknowledge the opposing view?
Yes — conceding that students also need practical skills, then explaining why that does not make history useless, makes your essay far more convincing than ignoring the other side. Just reaffirm your position afterwards.
Can I mention the skills a subject develops?
Absolutely. Pointing out that history builds analysis and argument — skills useful in any career — strengthens the "why it matters" argument and is rewarded under Task Response.
How long should the essay be?
At least 250 words; a band-9 answer is usually 260–290. This model is 282 words, enough to argue the main position and address the concession without padding.
Want feedback on your own answer?
Toey grades your essay on Task, Coherence, Lexical Resource and Grammar, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — free to start.
Try the free IELTS Writing grader