ToeyToey.
IELTS
TOEIC
Speaking
PricingBlog
Log inStart free
ToeyToey.

Your AI English coach for TOEIC, IELTS and Speaking — practice, instant feedback, and a plan, all in one place.

Product

  • Listening
  • Reading
  • Speaking
  • Writing
  • Grammar
  • Vocabulary
  • Practice tests

Resources

  • Blog
  • What's new
  • Study plan
  • Pricing

About

  • About us
  • Contact
  • Feedback

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Commercial Disclosure

© 2026 Toey. All rights reserved.

IELTS is a registered trademark of the University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, or IDP Education Australia.

ETS®, TOEIC® and TOEFL® are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). This website is not endorsed or approved by ETS.

DashboardMy planMock testsExam Mode
Home / IELTS / Writing Samples / Writing Task 2

IELTS Writing Task 2: Printed Books vs Online (Band 9 Sample)

This "to what extent do you agree or disagree" question asks whether free online content will end the sale of printed books and newspapers entirely. A band-9 response gives a clear degree of agreement and defends it with developed reasons. Below is a model answer of roughly 280 words that largely disagrees, followed by a breakdown of why it scores 9 on all four criteria.

Get your own IELTS essay graded by AI

Band scores on all four criteria, line-by-line corrections and a model rewrite — free to start.

Grade my essay free

1The task

In the future, nobody will buy printed books or newspapers because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

2Band 9 sample answer

281 words · Band 9

It is often claimed that free online content will make printed books and newspapers obsolete, with nobody willing to pay for them any longer. While digital reading is undoubtedly growing, I largely disagree with this prediction, as print retains qualities that many readers will continue to value and pay for.

1Why print will survive

To begin with, a printed book offers a physical experience that a screen cannot replicate. Many people enjoy the feel of paper, the absence of eye strain and the freedom from notifications, and they are happy to pay for a hardback they can keep, annotate or display on a shelf. For these readers, ownership matters as much as the words themselves.

Moreover, not all online material is free or trustworthy. Quality journalism is expensive to produce, so reputable newspapers increasingly place their content behind paywalls, and readers who want reliable, fact-checked reporting are willing to subscribe rather than trust unverified sources.

2The grain of truth in the claim

That said, the statement is not entirely wrong. Digital formats are cheaper, searchable and instantly available, and a whole generation has grown up reading on phones and tablets. Newspaper circulation has already fallen sharply, and it is reasonable to expect print runs to shrink further in the coming decades.

Even so, shrinking is not the same as disappearing. Vinyl records survived the arrival of streaming by appealing to enthusiasts, and printed books are likely to endure in the same way, as a valued minority choice rather than a dead one.

In conclusion, although online reading will keep expanding and printed newspapers in particular face decline, I do not accept that paid print will vanish altogether, because a significant number of readers will always prefer, and pay for, the physical page.

3Why this scores Band 9

1Task Response

The prompt asks "to what extent", and the answer gives a precise degree — "I largely disagree" — rather than a flat yes or no. It develops that stance ("a physical experience that a screen cannot replicate", paywalled "quality journalism") while conceding the trend the statement rests on, then narrows the concession to protect its position.

2Coherence & Cohesion

The essay is organised as case-for-print then measured concession, each paragraph on one idea. Cohesion is fluent and varied: "To begin with", "Moreover", "That said", "Even so", "In conclusion" mark each turn in the argument naturally, without a mechanical stack of memorised connectors.

3Lexical Resource

Vocabulary is precise and idiomatic — "a hardback they can keep, annotate or display", "behind paywalls", "fact-checked reporting", "a valued minority choice" — and the vinyl-records comparison is handled with natural phrasing ("survived the arrival of streaming"). No word is chosen merely to impress.

4Grammatical Range & Accuracy

A wide range of structures is controlled accurately: a defining relative clause ("readers who want reliable, fact-checked reporting"), a comparative structure ("ownership matters as much as the words themselves") and a fronted concessive ("Even so, shrinking is not the same as disappearing"). The writing stays error-free throughout.

4Useful collocations for this task

Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural collocations like these lift your Lexical Resource score.

5Frequently asked questions

What does "to what extent do you agree or disagree" require?

It asks you to state how strongly you agree or disagree — not just whether you do. Words such as "largely", "partly" or "completely" signal your degree of agreement. This model says "I largely disagree", which lets it defend print while still conceding the digital trend.

Is it acceptable to partly agree with the statement?

Yes. A balanced position is often the most convincing, provided it is clear. This answer disagrees overall but admits the statement contains "a grain of truth", then explains why that truth does not go as far as the prompt claims.

Can I use a comparison or example like vinyl records?

Absolutely. A well-chosen analogy — here, vinyl surviving the streaming era — makes an abstract argument vivid and is rewarded under Task Response and Lexical Resource. Keep it brief and relevant so it supports your point rather than distracting from it.

How long should the essay be?

Write at least 250 words; a band-9 answer is usually 260–290. This model answer is 281 words, long enough to argue both the main position and the concession without padding.

Want feedback on your own answer?

Toey grades your essay on Task, Coherence, Lexical Resource and Grammar, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — free to start.

Try the free IELTS Writing grader

More Writing Task 2 samples

  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Self-Employment (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Driverless Vehicles (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Sugar Tax (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Advertising (Band 9 Sample Answer)