IELTS Writing Task 2: Sugar Tax (Band 9 Sample Answer)
This "agree or disagree" question asks whether making sugary products more expensive would cut sugar consumption. A band-9 response takes a clear stance, develops each reason to its real-world effect, and deals honestly with the obvious objection. Below is a model answer of roughly 280 words that agrees with the proposal, followed by a breakdown of why it scores 9 on all four criteria.
Get your own IELTS essay graded by AI
Band scores on all four criteria, line-by-line corrections and a model rewrite — free to start.
1The task
Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
2Band 9 sample answer
278 words · Band 9Excessive sugar consumption is widely recognised as a driver of obesity, diabetes and tooth decay. It has been suggested that raising the price of sugary food and drink would push people to cut down. I strongly agree that this measure would improve public health, provided it is combined with other efforts.
1Why higher prices would help
The core reason is that price directly influences behaviour. When a product becomes more expensive, many consumers simply buy less of it, and the sharp fall in cigarette sales after repeated tax rises proves how effective this approach can be. Applied to sugary goods, a similar tax would nudge shoppers towards cheaper, healthier alternatives such as water or unsweetened snacks.
A further benefit is that the revenue raised could be reinvested in healthcare and education. Governments could use the money to fund treatment for diet-related illness or to teach children about nutrition, tackling the problem from both directions at once.
2Why a tax alone is not enough
Critics rightly point out that higher prices hit the poorest hardest, since low-income families spend a larger share of their income on food. This is a genuine concern, but it can be answered by using the tax revenue to subsidise fresh produce, so that healthy eating becomes more affordable rather than less.
It is also true that price is not the only factor; habit and ignorance play a part too. For this reason a tax works best alongside clear labelling and public-health campaigns that explain why cutting sugar matters.
In conclusion, I agree that making sugary products more expensive would encourage healthier choices and generate useful funds, and although it should not be the sole solution, it is a sensible and justified step towards a healthier population.
3Why this scores Band 9
1Task Response
A firm position is declared in the introduction ("I strongly agree that this measure would improve public health") and sustained throughout. Each reason is pushed to its consequence — higher price → consumers "buy less of it", revenue → "fund treatment for diet-related illness" — and the strongest counter-argument is acknowledged and answered rather than ignored.
2Coherence & Cohesion
The essay moves logically from supporting reasons to a reasoned rebuttal, each paragraph organised around a single idea. Cohesion is natural: "The core reason", "A further benefit", "Critics rightly point out", "In conclusion" guide the reader smoothly without a mechanical list of linking words.
3Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is precise and topic-appropriate — "cut down", "nudge shoppers towards", "diet-related illness", "subsidise fresh produce", "clear labelling" — used correctly and without strain. Every advanced item is the natural choice, which is what band 9 rewards rather than rare or showy words.
4Grammatical Range & Accuracy
A wide range of structures appears under full control: a conditional-style adverbial ("provided it is combined with other efforts"), a defining relative clause ("campaigns that explain why cutting sugar matters") and a fronted participial ("Applied to sugary goods, a similar tax would nudge…"). The prose is error-free without forced complexity.
4Useful collocations for this task
Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural collocations like these lift your Lexical Resource score.
5Frequently asked questions
How do I answer an "agree or disagree" question?
Decide clearly whether you agree or disagree, state that position in the introduction, and defend it consistently. This model fully agrees, so it argues for the tax and treats the main objection as something to answer, not a reason to change sides. Wavering between the two costs you Task Response marks.
Can I partly agree, or must I pick one side?
A partial position is allowed, but it must still be a clear one — for example, "I agree, provided the revenue helps low-income families". Avoid a vague "it depends" with no commitment. This answer agrees strongly while accepting that a tax alone is not the whole solution.
Should I include the opposing argument?
Addressing a counter-argument, as this model does with the concern about poorer families, is a strong technique because it shows depth of thought. Just make sure you rebut it or put it in perspective, so it strengthens your position rather than undermining it.
How long should the essay be?
Write at least 250 words; a band-9 answer is typically 260–290. This model answer is 278 words — enough to develop both reasons and a rebuttal without padding.
Want feedback on your own answer?
Toey grades your essay on Task, Coherence, Lexical Resource and Grammar, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — free to start.
Try the free IELTS Writing grader