IELTS Writing Task 2: Taking Risks (Band 9 Sample)
This "do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages" question asks whether taking risks in work and personal life is, on balance, worthwhile. A band-9 response weighs both sides but reaches a clear overall judgement rather than staying neutral. Below is a model answer of roughly 280 words, followed by a breakdown of why it scores 9 on all four criteria.
Get your own IELTS essay graded by AI
Band scores on all four criteria, line-by-line corrections and a model rewrite — free to start.
01 · The task
It is important for people to take risks, both in their professional and personal lives. Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages?
02 · Band 9 sample answer
283 words · Band 9Some people believe that a willingness to take risks is essential to a full and successful life, while others see it as reckless. Having weighed both positions, I firmly believe that the advantages of taking sensible risks outweigh the drawbacks, provided those risks are calculated rather than blind.
1. The case for taking risks
The clearest advantage is that meaningful progress almost always requires stepping into the unknown. Professionally, anyone who starts a business, changes career or proposes a bold idea is taking a risk, yet these are precisely the moves that lead to growth and innovation; a person who never risks failure rarely achieves anything remarkable. The same is true personally: forming close relationships, travelling alone or learning a difficult skill all involve the possibility of failure, but they are also the experiences that make life rich and help us grow in confidence.
2. The disadvantages, and why they are smaller
Of course, risk carries real dangers. Reckless decisions can lead to financial ruin, injury or damaged relationships, and some people become addicted to the thrill of risk to their own cost. However, these outcomes usually stem from careless risks taken without thought, not from the measured kind I am defending. A person who weighs the odds and prepares for failure limits the damage while keeping the upside, which is why the disadvantages, though genuine, are the smaller consideration.
In conclusion, although taking risks can clearly go wrong, I am convinced that the benefits are greater, because a life without any risk is not only unadventurous but also, in the long run, self-limiting.
03 · Why this scores Band 9
The essay answers the exact question — do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages — with a clear verdict ("the advantages... outweigh the drawbacks"), qualified sensibly ("provided those risks are calculated"). Both sides are developed, but the answer commits rather than sitting on the fence.
It is organised as advantages then disadvantages, each fully developed, with the judgement framed at the start and end. Cohesion is fluent and varied — "The clearest advantage is...", "Of course...", "However...", "In conclusion" — and each paragraph keeps to one idea.
Vocabulary is precise and idiomatic — "stepping into the unknown", "weighs the odds", "financial ruin", "keeping the upside", "self-limiting" — and the distinction between "calculated" and "blind" risk is expressed with real precision rather than filler.
A wide range is controlled accurately: a "provided" conditional in the introduction, a "yet" contrast within a sentence, and a relative clause carrying the argument ("the measured kind I am defending"). The final "because" clause delivers the judgement, and the writing is error-free.
04 · Useful collocations for this task
Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural collocations like these lift your Lexical Resource score.
05 · Frequently asked questions
How do I answer a "do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages" question?
Discuss both, but reach a clear verdict on which is greater. This model develops the advantages, then the disadvantages, and states in both the introduction and conclusion that the advantages win. A neutral "both are important" answer scores poorly.
Is it the same as a "discuss both views" essay?
Not quite. "Discuss both views" asks you to present two sides plus your opinion; "do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages" specifically asks you to compare and judge the balance. Always answer the exact question asked.
Can I qualify my position?
Yes, and it often strengthens the essay. Here the answer defends "calculated" rather than "blind" risk, which lets it acknowledge the dangers of recklessness without weakening its main claim.
How long should the essay be?
At least 250 words; a band-9 answer is usually 260–290. This model is 283 words, enough to weigh both sides and land a clear judgement without padding.
Want feedback on your own answer?
Toey grades your essay on Task, Coherence, Lexical Resource and Grammar, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — free to start.
Try the free IELTS Writing grader