ToeyToey.
IELTS
TOEIC
Speaking
PricingBlog
Log in
Start free
ToeyToey.

Your AI English coach for TOEIC, IELTS and Speaking — practice, instant feedback, and a plan, all in one place.

Product

  • Listening
  • Reading
  • Speaking
  • Writing
  • Grammar
  • Vocabulary
  • Practice tests

Resources

  • Blog
  • IELTS Writing Samples
  • IELTS Speaking Samples
  • IELTS Tools
  • What's new
  • Study plan
  • Pricing

About

  • About us
  • Contact
  • Feedback

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Commercial Disclosure

© 2026 Toey. All rights reserved.

IELTS is a registered trademark of the University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, or IDP Education Australia.

ETS®, TOEIC® and TOEFL® are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). This website is not endorsed or approved by ETS.

DashboardMy planMock testsExam Mode
Home/IELTS/Writing Samples/Writing Task 2
Writing Task 2

IELTS Writing Task 2: Space Exploration (Band 9 Sample)

This "to what extent do you agree or disagree" question asks whether the money spent on space exploration is justified, or whether it would be better used on problems here on Earth. A band-9 response gives a clear degree of agreement and defends it while engaging with the counter-argument. Below is a model answer of roughly 280 words, followed by a breakdown of why it scores 9 on all four criteria.

Get your own IELTS essay graded by AI

Band scores on all four criteria, line-by-line corrections and a model rewrite — free to start.

Grade my essay free

01 · The task

Some people think that the money spent on space exploration would be better used to solve problems on Earth, such as poverty and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

02 · Band 9 sample answer

281 words · Band 9

Space programmes cost enormous sums, and some argue this money would do more good tackling poverty and disease at home. While I understand the appeal of this view, I only partly agree with it, because space exploration brings benefits that are easy to overlook.

1. Why the money could be better spent

There is a genuine moral force to the argument. When millions of people lack clean water, medicine or education, spending billions to send probes to distant planets can seem indefensible. That money could fund hospitals, schools and clean-energy projects with an immediate, measurable impact on human suffering, and for the poorest countries in particular, such priorities are hard to dispute.

2. Why space exploration still matters

However, treating this as a simple choice is misleading. Space research has produced technologies we now take for granted — satellite communications, weather forecasting, GPS and countless medical advances — many of which directly help solve problems on Earth. Moreover, space budgets are tiny compared with what governments spend on, say, the military, so cutting them would barely dent global poverty. Exploration also drives scientific progress and may prove essential to humanity's long-term survival.

In conclusion, although the case for prioritising urgent human needs is a strong one, I do not fully accept that space exploration is a waste, since the knowledge and technology it generates ultimately benefit life on Earth as well.

03 · Why this scores Band 9

Task Response

The answer gives a precise degree of agreement — "I only partly agree" — and defends both sides: the moral case for spending on human needs, and the practical spin-off benefits of space research. The nuanced position is stated in the introduction and resolved in the conclusion.

Coherence & Cohesion

The essay balances "why the money could be better spent" against "why space still matters", one idea per paragraph, with the stance signalled early. Cohesion is natural — "There is a genuine moral force...", "However, treating this as a simple choice is misleading", "Moreover", "In conclusion".

Lexical Resource

Vocabulary is precise and idiomatic — "a genuine moral force", "an immediate, measurable impact", "take for granted", "barely dent global poverty", "long-term survival" — with confident collocation carrying an abstract argument.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

A wide range is controlled accurately: a concessive ("While I understand the appeal of this view"), a relative clause ("technologies... many of which directly help solve problems on Earth"), and a comparative ("tiny compared with what governments spend on the military"). The writing stays error-free.

04 · Useful collocations for this task

Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural collocations like these lift your Lexical Resource score.

05 · Frequently asked questions

Can I "partly agree" in a to-what-extent essay?

Yes, and it often produces a strong answer. This model accepts the moral pull of spending on Earth's problems but rejects the idea that space exploration is wasteful. The key is to make the degree of agreement explicit rather than vague.

Do I need real examples of space technology?

Well-chosen examples help a lot. Naming GPS, satellites or weather forecasting shows the "spin-off benefits" point vividly and is rewarded under Task Response and Lexical Resource. Keep them accurate and brief.

How do I avoid sitting on the fence?

Give a clear overall judgement even while discussing both sides. This answer concludes that space exploration is "not a waste" — a definite position — rather than saying both uses of money are equally valid.

How long should the essay be?

At least 250 words; a band-9 answer is usually 260–290. This model is 281 words, enough to argue both sides and reach a clear, qualified judgement without padding.

Want feedback on your own answer?

Toey grades your essay on Task, Coherence, Lexical Resource and Grammar, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — free to start.

Try the free IELTS Writing grader

More Writing Task 2 samples

  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Self-Employment (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Driverless Vehicles (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Sugar Tax (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Printed Books vs Online (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Advertising (Band 9 Sample Answer)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Home Ownership vs Renting (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Music Brings People Together (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Children and Smartphones (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Taking Risks (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: The Aim of Science (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Crime & Punishment (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Working From Home (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: One Global Language (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Free University Education (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Protecting the Environment — Individuals or Governments (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Ageing Population (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Competition vs Cooperation in Education (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Censorship of Information (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Tourism Benefits & Drawbacks (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Fast Food & Health (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: The Importance of Studying History (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Technology & Social Isolation (Band 9 Sample)
  • IELTS Writing Task 2: Taking a Gap Year (Band 9 Sample)