IELTS Speaking Part 3: Technology & Communication (Band 9 Sample)
IELTS Speaking Part 3 is a two-way discussion of more abstract questions linked to your Part 2 topic — here, technology and communication. A band-9 answer takes a clear position, develops it with reasons and examples, and often concedes the other side before drawing a careful distinction. Below are four common discussion questions with band-9 model answers, plus why they score 9 and the collocations worth stealing.
Practice this exact speaking task with AI feedback
Record your answer and get a band score on all four criteria — Pro plan, credit-metered.
01 · Discussion questions & Band 9 answers
Q: How has technology changed the way people communicate?
It's transformed it almost beyond recognition. A generation ago, staying in touch with someone abroad meant an expensive phone call or a letter that took weeks; now I can video-call a friend on the other side of the world for free, instantly. What strikes me most, though, is the shift from occasional, deliberate contact to this constant, low-level connection — we're always reachable now, for better or worse.
contrast the past with the presentQ: Do you think face-to-face communication will become less common?
I doubt it'll disappear, but I do think its role is changing. For routine things — quick updates, arranging to meet — people will increasingly default to a message. But for anything that really matters, like a difficult conversation or celebrating with family, nothing replaces being in the same room. There's a warmth and a nuance to face-to-face contact that a screen simply can't carry.
concede, then draw a distinctionQ: What are the downsides of relying on technology to communicate?
The most obvious one is that a lot gets lost in translation. Tone doesn't come across in a text, so misunderstandings are far more common than people realise. Beyond that, I'd argue it can make us strangely lonelier — we mistake being constantly connected for being genuinely close, when actually scrolling through other people's lives can leave you feeling more isolated, not less.
name the obvious point, then go deeperQ: Should there be limits on how much children use social media?
I think some limits are sensible, yes, though I'd be wary of banning it outright. Children's brains are still developing, and the addictive design of these platforms isn't something a ten-year-old can reasonably push back against. That said, the answer isn't just restriction — it's teaching them to use it critically, because these tools clearly aren't going away.
balanced stance, avoid extremes02 · Why this scores Band 9
Each answer builds an argument in stages — claim, reason, example, then a qualifying turn ('What strikes me most, though...') — so the discussion develops rather than lists points. The delivery stays connected across the longer turns without hesitation.
Abstract-discussion vocabulary is precise and idiomatic — 'beyond recognition', 'lost in translation', 'low-level connection', 'push back against' — and the collocations carry the argument instead of decorating it.
A wide range is handled accurately across longer answers: a cleft ('What strikes me most is...'), a concessive ('I doubt it'll disappear, but...'), and hedged modality ('it can make us strangely lonelier'). Complex ideas are expressed without breakdown.
Longer turns are chunked into clear thought groups with stress falling on the argument's key words, so the intonation signals contrast and emphasis the way a fluent debater's would.
03 · Useful phrases for this topic
Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural phrases like these lift your Lexical Resource score.
04 · Frequently asked questions
How is Part 3 different from Part 1?
Part 1 is about you and your life in short answers; Part 3 zooms out to society and ideas, and expects developed, opinion-led answers of several sentences. It's a discussion, so the examiner may challenge you — treat that as a chance to show range.
Do I need real facts and statistics?
No. Part 3 tests how you reason in English, not your general knowledge. A clear opinion backed by logic and a plausible example ('a letter that took weeks') scores far higher than a half-remembered statistic.
Is it okay to disagree with the examiner?
Completely. Politely pushing back ('I doubt it'll disappear, but...') and explaining why shows exactly the critical thinking band 9 rewards. There are no right answers — only well-argued ones.
How long should a Part 3 answer be?
Aim for three to five sentences: state your view, give a reason, add an example or concession. Long enough to develop the idea, short enough to keep the conversation flowing.
Want feedback on your own answer?
Toey grades your recording on Fluency, Lexical Resource, Grammar and Pronunciation, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — Pro plan, credit-metered.
Try IELTS Speaking practice